Case Analysis : S.R. Bommai v. Union Of India
Bench The Bench in this case- Justice S.R. Pandian Justice A.M. Ahmadi Justice Kuldip Singh Justice J.S. Verma Justice P.B. Sawant Justice K. Ramaswamy Justice
Bench The Bench in this case- Justice S.R. Pandian Justice A.M. Ahmadi Justice Kuldip Singh Justice J.S. Verma Justice P.B. Sawant Justice K. Ramaswamy Justice
In the judgement in Shayara Bano v. Union of India[1], the Supreme Court declared this custom of ‘triple talaq’ unconstitutional.
The Court said that children are the future of the country and they should be brought up properly so they turn out to be responsible
Post-independence, the Parliament decided to enact land reforms in the states of Bihar, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh through legislation
In this case, the Court found that the State is vicariously responsible for the tortious acts done by its employees
While this writ petition was pending, the Court appointed the Bhargava Committee for the purpose of inspecting limestone quarries.
If we look back to history, we remember nothing but a date, that is, 15th August 1947 because that day we achieved independence from British
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain[1] is a landmark judgement in the history of the legal system. This case has brought many changes
the Mandal Commission case, is one of the most remarkable dictums of the apex court on the reservation of posts for backward classes
court relied on the judgment of MC Mehta v. Union of India[2], which is responsible for the evolution of absolute liability
Copyright © 2024. Corporate Ninja. All Rights Reserved.
Made with ❤️ by Parag Agrawal
Copyright © 2024. Corporate Ninja.
Made with ❤️ by Parag Agrawal