Date of Judgment 13/08/1986 Bench: BHAGWATI, P.N. (CJ) BENCH: BHAGWATI, P.N. (CJ) MISRA RANGNATH Citation: JT 1986 136 1986 SCALE (2)230 Act: Constitution of India, 1950, Article 21-Speedy trial- Whether fundamental right of accused. Facts of the Case Sheela Barse,
Criminal Appeal No. 538-539 of 2019
Section 212(3) of the 2013 Act by itself does not lay down any settled period inside which the examination report by SFIO has got to be submitted. There’s no stipulation of any settled period for completion of examination which is steady with ordinary standards beneath the common law.
Criminal Appeal nos. 827-830 of 2012
Citation(s) – REED 2017 SC 4386
Case Number- CIVIL APPEAL NO. 9279 OF 2017
Court – Supreme Court
Bench- N.A.
Date – July 24, 2017
Law – Article 142, Constitution of India,1950 Rule 8, I&B (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016 Rule 11, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016
Rule(s)/ Regulation(s) – Rule 8, I&B (Application to Adjudicating Authority) Rules, 2016
Rule 11, National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Rules, 2016
Appellant – Lokhandwala Kataria Construction Private Limited
Respondent- Nisus Finance and Investment Managers LLP
Judge(s) – Hon’ble ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN, J. Hon’ble SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, J.
Application No. 1244 Of 1950 In Original Petition No. 429 Of 1948 | 12-12-1950
Introduction In Kapil N. Mehta, Surat V. Shree Laxmi Motors Restricted, the organization passed a circuitous objective which was allowed by the Articles, be that as it may not envision beneath the Organization’s Demonstration at that point. A case was
Facts The actualities giving rise to this reference are or may be abnormal and since they are bizarre the address that we ought to reply to appears to be a small nuisance. The assessees were share-holders of the Navjivan Mills
Hon’ble Mr. Justice Suhas C.Sen Hon’ble Mr. Justice V.N. Khare Gopal Jain, Adv. for Mukul Mudgal, Adv. for the appealing party J. Ramamurthy, Sr.Adv., T.C.Sharma, N.K.Agarwal, B.K.Prasad, Advs. with him, for the Respondent J U D G M E N T, The taking after Judgment of the Court was conveyed: SEN, J.
Preference Shares The foremost eminent inclination offers is that they will regularly have a privilege to a settled rate of profit, ordinarily communicated as a rate of the ostensible esteem of the offers themselves. This settled rate profit will be
