This case[1] deals with the Companies Act, 1956[2] where the contravention of Section 295(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 came into the picture.In this writ petition before the Bombay High Court, the petitioner who was the original accused No.6 challenged
This case[1] deals with the challenge of the order passed by the Company Law Board where the appellant’s petition which was filed under Section 113(3)[2] of the Companies Act, 1956[3] got dismissed. FACTS OF THE CASE The appellant was a
This case[1] is related to the delegated legislation where the executive authority is provided with the powers by the primary legislation to make laws to implement and administer the necessities as well as the primary legislation. This case came as
This suit[1] is filed for a declaration that the notice which dates back to 1st of March 1963 is null and void, and that the resolutions which got its mentions in that purported notice are illegal, unlawful and ultra vires
The court in this case discusses the judgement of the Competition Commission of India in light of the previously decided cases on the same issues. The Competition Commission of India had allowed complaints against an alleged dominant player.
Procedure of striking off the name of a company from the Register of Companies is laid down in Section 248 of the Companies Act, 2013. The Registrar must follow this procedure along with the relevant rules. In this case, the
Introduction This case is in regard to the Collective Investment scheme and discusses an important ruling of Supreme Court in determining that a collective investment scheme (CIS) operated by a private trust is illegal and the same can be only
Introduction: In case of State Bank of India v. Mr. V. Ramakrishnan and Others (decided on August 14, 2018), the Hon’ble Supreme Court resolved the issue relating to applicability of moratorium passed under Section 14 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy
Introduction Citizenship is the status with an individual perceived under law similar to a lawful individual from a sovereign state or having a place with a country. In India, Articles 5 – 11 of the Constitution manages the idea of
Equivalent citations: 2002 111 CompCas 826 Ker Bench: S Sankarasubban, R Bhaskaran INTRODUCTION The Companies Act, 2013, defines a director to mean ‘a director appointed to the Board of a company.’ It is a well-acknowledged fact that a company is
Introduction The capital of a company is divided into units of a fixed category and such units are shared. A share in the share capital of a company and incorporates stock which is characterized under Section 2(84) of Companies Act,
This case states that the Doctrine of Constructive Notice mandates that before entering into a transaction with a company, one should be well aware of the rights and obligations of the directors of the company, all the more so, when the concerned documents are available for public access.
This was a writ petition[1] filed in the Andhra High Court related to the jurisdiction of Civil Court to entertain a civil suit dealing with the question related to the disqualification of the director of a company under the Sections
The decision cleared major loopholes in the Companies Act, 1956 and the SEBI Act of 1992, by providing proper interpretation and larger scope to provisions at dispute. The main issues cleared were regarding ‘hybrid’ securities, public offers of securities, jurisdiction of SEBI, etc.
