OP Gupta v. Shiv General Finance Ltd. and Anr. 1975
Citation- 1977 47 CompCas 279 Delhi
Rhea Banerjee
April 29, 2022
Citation- 1977 47 CompCas 279 Delhi
Citation – 2007 137 CompCas 259 Delhi
Citation – W.P. (C) No. 10517 of 2009
Citation: 2004(3) AWC 2366 SC
Acts:
Section 2(1) (zb) of the Trademarks Act, 1999
Section 2(1)(z)
Merchandise Marks Acts, 1958
Trademarks Acts, 1999
Introduction The concept of majority rule has been applied to the management of corporate affairs. Resolutions on numerous subjects are passed by a simple majority or a three-fourths majority of the members. When a resolution is passed with the required
Introduction The Companies Act, 2013 provides certain protections to the minority shareholders against the basic principle of majority rule i.e., When a resolution is passed with the required majority, it becomes binding on all company members. As a result, the
Introduction According to section 2(68) the Companies Act, 2013 a “company” means a company incorporated under this Act or under any previous company law. In common law, a company is a “legal person” or “legal entity” separate from, and capable
Introduction The notion of majority rule has been applied to the management of corporate affairs. Resolutions on various topics are passed by a simple majority or a three-fourths majority of the members. When a resolution is passed with the required
Introduction ‘To win in a democracy, you must have a majority.’ Similarly, a company, which is an association of individuals, acts in accordance with the majority of its members’ decisions. The minority, or dissenting members, are bound by the decisions
Introduction The basic principle governing the management of a corporation’s affairs is that “the courts will not, in general, intervene at the request of shareholders in matters of internal administration; and will not interfere with the management of a corporation
