Waris Agrotech (India) Limited and Directors

The court in this case talks about the registration of shares in Public stock market and the criteria under Companies act for the same. This judgment is still relevant when dispute arises based on such kinds of securities

Re Kaytech International

The case analysis incorporates the Irish Companies Act, 1990, as it specifically mentions about de-jure and shadow directors and restrictions upon them, when a company goes insolvent. The analysis part also incorporates criticisms to the case at hand and how concepts of de-facto and shadow director have developed.

Cosmosteels Pvt. Ltd. v. Jairam Das Gupta

The court in this case talks about oppression of shareholders, self-sale of company’s share and requirement of notice. The case has differentiated between the two sects of provision i.e. Section 100-104 and Section-402, so as to prevent the majority from again, intervening an appeal brought against the same majority.

Ernest v. Nicholls

The court in this case discusses the doctrine of constructive notice and doctrine of indoor management. The article also deals with how various countries have dealt with the decision made in this case.

Twycross v. Grant

The case dealt with Fraudulent Prospectus, Concealment of Contract and Responsibility of the Company to refund the price paid for the shares. The plaintiff sought to recover the amount paid by him for the shares in the company, namely the Lisbon Steam Tramways Company.

M.O.Vergese v. Thomas Stephen and Co. Ltd.

The case is related to the contravention of Section-299, petition filed under Section-633, cessation of directorship under Section-283(1) (i) and liabilities that arose from the contravention, under the Companies Act, 1956 (hereinafter, “the Act”). The case was between a director and a company which was accompanied by the Registrar of Companies.

Radhey Shyam Khemka and Anr. Etc vs. State Of Bihar and Anr.

This judgement sets an example that prosecution cannot be quashed merely because the nature of the case appears to be civil. Therefore, the judgement has also increased the brink for quashing of prosecution under S.482 by the High Courts and ensures that there is not mass quashing of criminal proceedings.

Hey there!

come here often?

Login To Come In