L.K.PRABHU v. S.M. AMEERULMILLATH [2002]40 SCL 385

This was a case which came before the Kerala High Court on the question of maintability of a petition under Section 543[1] of the Companies Act,1956[2] alleging misfeasance against the Official Liquidator. FACTS OF THE CASE In this case, the

LALCHANDSURANA v. HYDERABAD VANASPATI LTD. 69 Comp Cas 415 (AP

This case[1] is related to the maintainability of the petition filed by three shareholders of the company named Hyderabad Vanaspati Ltd., a public limited company which was having its registered office at Hyderabad. The shareholders filed the petition for the

HANUMAN PRASAD GUPTA vs HIRALAL 1971 AIR 206,1970 SCR (3) 788

In this case[1] the jurisdiction aspect came into picture related to the cases related to the company. Here, jurisdiction of the Magistrate at Meerut to try the complaints related to the case of the Company came into the picture. In

ATUL B. MUNIM vs REGISTRAR OF COMPANIES & ORS.(2000)102 BOMLR 288

The petition was filed under the provision of Section 482[1] of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973[2] for quashing the complaint which was filed by the Respondent No.1, i.e. the Registrar of the Companies in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan

Hey there!

come here often?

Login To Come In