Resourceful. Naturally.
Resourceful. Naturally.
This[1] is an application filed by one of the creditors of the Sree Ram Vilasam Press and Publications (P.) Ltd., now in liquidation, for a declaration under Section 542(1)[2] of the Companies Act, 1956[3], that its former directors and general manager are…
This was a Compounding Application[1] filed before the National Company Law Tribunal, Mumbai Bench on 23rd of February 2017 and the same has been forwarded to the RoC[2], Mumbai for its report and the said report has been filed to…
“Creating something new with your thoughts requires the efforts and talent, and that credit of creating something different and new must be protected for the time being in favour of the creator to ripe the benefits out of it.” Copyright…
This case[1] deals with the challenge of the order passed by the Company Law Board where the appellant’s petition which was filed under Section 113(3)[2] of the Companies Act, 1956[3] got dismissed. FACTS OF THE CASE The appellant was a…
Rajendra Shah v. State of Maharashtra deals with the Companies Act, 1956[2] where the contravention of Section 295(4) of the Companies Act, 1956 came into the picture. In this writ petition before the Bombay High Court, the petitioner who was…
This case[1] is related to the authorization of the Director of the Company to use the trademark of the Company at his/ her discretion and then compete the business of that company only, whose trademark is used by him This…
This case of Raj Narain v. Chairman, Patna Administration Committee[1] is related to the delegated legislation where the executive authority is provided with the powers by the primary legislation to make laws to implement and administer the necessities as well…
This suit[1] is filed for a declaration that the notice which dates back to 1st of March 1963 is null and void, and that the resolutions which got its mentions in that purported notice are illegal, unlawful and ultra vires…
This appeal[1] arises out of an application filed by the first respondent under Section 162, clause (v)[2] and (vi)[3], Companies Act, 1913[4], for an order that the Rajahmundry Electric Supply Corporation Ltd. be wound up. FACTS OF THE CASE The…
In this case[1], an application was filed by the company M Vintage Hotels Private Ltd. praying for setting aside of the winding up order dated 04-12-1998 The application has been hotly contested and a large number of documents have been…
There is a famous quote, which says “Precaution is better than cure”, and this quote surely has its relevance in the licensing strategy of patent as well. The strategy to license should be well planned so that in future, no…
This is a case[1] which dealt with the family disputes matter and the problems arose due to this knocked the doors of the Court under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956[2].The dispute relates with the illegal transfer…
This was a case which came before the Kerala High Court on the question of maintability of a petition under Section 543[1] of the Companies Act,1956[2] alleging misfeasance against the Official Liquidator. FACTS OF THE CASE In this case, the…
In this case, the issue came before the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court where the assessee as well as the Commissioner aggrieved by the order of Income Tax Tribunal sought for reference before the High Court. This reference under Section 256…
