This appeal[1] by special leave raises the vexed question whether a particular expenditure incurred by the assessee is of capital or revenue nature. The Court in this case took this issue in consideration and came out with its decision. FACTS
INTRODUCTION The cryptocurrency use, regulations and the problems attached with it are very much in limelight these days. The recent order of Hon’ble Supreme Court removing the ban on the use of the cryptocurrency is being seen as a landmark
“The more you market your brand, the more you are popular among the public”. This very strategy is being used in this covid era, where masks have become a new normal. Covid-19[1] has brought a new era of branding where
This petition[1] is filed under Section 111A[2] of the Companies Act, 1956[3]. In this case, the petitioner company has sought for rectification of the Register of members of Bombay Dyeing & Manufacturing Company Ltd by deleting the names pf respondents
This was a writ petition[1] filed in the Andhra High Court related to the jurisdiction of Civil Court to entertain a civil suit dealing with the question related to the disqualification of the director of a company under the Sections
“The more you market your brand, the more you are popular among the public”. This very strategy is being used in this covid era, where masks have become a new normal. Covid-19[1] has brought a new era of branding where
The petition was filed under the provision of Section 482[1] of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973[2] for quashing the complaint which was filed by the Respondent No.1, i.e. the Registrar of the Companies in the Court of Additional Chief Metropolitan
“Innovation leads to more creations and this, in turn, bring more competition, but it gives exclusive rights as well to the one who comes up with that innovation, contrary to the competition law.” This one line is giving the crux
In this case[1], it is considered that if an Act contravenes the freedom conferred by the Constitution of India, it is invalid such as the Assam (On the Goods Transported Through Roads or Water Ways) Tax Act,1954. This case relates
